Reimagining Academic Progress: A Shift from Pipeline to Pathways Model in Education Studies

A group of scholars from nine renowned universities have called for a paradigm shift in the study of academic progress, proposing an updated model that recognizes the complex nature of university curriculums and students' journeys through them. By moving away from the traditional 'pipeline' metaphor used to describe educational pathways, they argue that we can better understand how students navigate their educational experiences.

The pipeline metaphor, once a useful tool in education studies, has limitations which researchers have now identified as problematic for several reasons. Firstly, it envisions universities as institutions designed to develop skills within specific disciplines through structured and sequential learning processes. However, many institutions promote exploratory curriculums that allow students to combine various fields of study, particularly at universities like Stanford where majors are often deferred until midway through undergraduate studies.

By using the pipeline metaphor, educators perceive any deviation from a student's original academic trajectory as 'leakage', or loss. Yet, this perspective overlooks the dynamic nature of student decision-making and ignores their active role in shaping their educational paths. The metaphor also implies that students enter college with a clear sense of direction, while universities are tasked with guiding them towards these goals.

The new 'pathways' model emphasizes both student autonomy and the curriculum's structure, recognizing the interplay between them. It examines how students respond to different academic offerings, identifying pivotal moments in their academic progression when choosing a particular major becomes less viable. This approach could help identify areas for intervention that promote equity by offering insights into decision-making processes.

Traditionally, researchers have used statistical techniques to chart enrollment patterns episodically, which provides limited insight into student choices and considerations. However, recent advancements in computational science enable more complex data analysis on academic progress. These developments allow researchers to visualize varying pathways leading to different majors, critical turning points along these paths, and areas of curricular overlap that could inform changes in course offerings.

To facilitate the application of 'pathways' research across institutions, the scholars advocate for a shared analytical framework and infrastructure. They emphasize building systems for standardizing data collection and open-source analytical tools designed specifically for studying academic progress.

Rene F. Kizilcec from Cornell University, Rachel B. Baker from the University of Pennsylvania, Elizabeth Bruch from the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, Kalena E. Cortes from Texas AM University, Laura T. Hamilton from the University of California at Merced, David Nathan Lang from Western Governors University, Zachary A. Pardos from the University of California at Berkeley, and Marissa E. Thompson from Columbia University are among the authors who have proposed these changes.

Mitchell L. Stevens, a co-director of the Stanford Pathways Lab, has contributed to advancing this field through ongoing research initiatives that explore the study of academic progress.

In summary, embracing an updated studying academic pathways acknowledges students' dynamic decision-making processes and promotes equitable educational opportunities by focusing on both student autonomy and institutional structure. This shift in perspective could lead to more informed decisions about curriculum development and better support student success.
This article is reproduced from: https://ed.stanford.edu/news/pipelines-pathways-researchers-call-new-approach-studying-academic-progress

Please indicate when reprinting from: https://www.733m.com/Graduate_entrance_examination/Academic_Pathways_Revolution.html